Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-07 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.88 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blush gold and Navy blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is better than Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter device than the Moto G9 Plus, even though they were only released 3 months apart. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and Moto G9 Plus has Android 10.
Galaxy A71 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better camera than Moto G9 Plus. Both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same resolution camera, a same size back camera sensor and the same video quality. The Galaxy A71 5G has slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Moto G9 Plus counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.