Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is much better than the Moto X (2014), getting a general score of 81.3 against 73.4. Google Pixel XL's body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than the Moto X (2014). Moto X (2014) features a slightly better screen than Google Pixel XL, although it has a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little worse display pixel density and a quite smaller display.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 cores, the Motorola Moto X (2014) also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Google Pixel XL has a little bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a less MP back-facing camera and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos and a larger camera aperture.
Google Pixel XL has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory. The Google Pixel XL has a superior battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto X (2014). If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto X (2014), letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.