Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than Moto X (2014), having an 83.7 score against 73.4. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0. LG V50 ThinQ is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner device than the Moto X (2014), but it's also heavier.
The Moto X (2014) counts with a bit more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a lot worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, a just a little worse pixels density and a bit smaller screen. LG V50 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.