Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-07-28 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is a lot better than the Moto X Style's global score of 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G body is newer and a lot thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Moto X Style. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and Moto X Style has Android 6.0 version, so it gives a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a better performing processor than Moto X Style, because it has more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. Moto X Style features a sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per inch of screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Moto X Style, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G features a superior camera than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a camera with way more MP, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy A71 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.