Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-28 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than Motorola Moto X Style, getting an 85.5 score against 73.8. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is incredibly newer and notably thinner, but a little heavier than Motorola Moto X Style. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a more powerful CPU than Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM.
Moto X Style counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher pixels density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X Style, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto X Style features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Style also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features improved battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.