Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is slightly better than Moto X4, with a 76.4 score against 74.4. Even being the best in this comparison review, Motorola Droid Turbo is a much older, a bit heavier and notably thicker cellphone than Moto X4. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto X4, because although it has 4 less processing cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better looking display than Moto X4, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a slightly better camera than Moto X4, because although it has lower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F2 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a way better resolution back camera.
The Motorola Moto X4 has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto X4 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Droid Turbo has superior battery lifetime than Moto X4, because it has a 30% more battery size.
Motorola Droid Turbo not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.