Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A12 is a little bit better than the Moto X4, having a overall score of 80.3 against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A12 design is extremely newer than Moto X4's, but it is thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A12 features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto X4 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixel number per inch in the display and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution. Galaxy A12 features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy A12 also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A12 has slightly more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A12 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.