Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is better than the Moto X4, having an 84.7 score against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a much newer phone than Moto X4, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The Moto X4 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Moto X4 features a better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a much greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size. Galaxy A32 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.