Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the Moto X4, with a score of 81 against 74.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and the Moto X4 were released with only 8 months difference, Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is somewhat heavier but also somewhat thinner than the Moto X4. The Moto X4 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto X4 features a slightly better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 1920px, the Moto X4 also counts with a little higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Moto X4 takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot better video resolution.
Motorola Moto X4 counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features longer battery performance than Moto X4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.