Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is better than the Moto Z Play Droid's global score of 71.8. LG V50 ThinQ's body is notably newer than Moto Z Play Droid's, but it is just a little heavier and thicker. LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a larger screen, more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ captures a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations.
LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery life than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.