Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, getting a overall score of 90.5 against 71.8. Galaxy A90 5G's construction is newer, but heavier and thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A90 5G captures much better videos and photos than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.