Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Holographic white |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Stylo 6 is a little bit better than the Moto Z Play, getting a 76.7 score against 74.4. LG Stylo 6's design is incredibly newer than the Moto Z Play's, but it is noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Stylo 6 has the older 10 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG Stylo 6 counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Stylo 6 also has more RAM memory. LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
The Motorola Moto Z Play captures slightly better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a more mega pixels back camera. The LG Stylo 6 features more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Stylo 6 also has 64 GB internal storage.
LG Stylo 6 features a bit superior battery performance than Moto Z Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG Stylo 6 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.