Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Ocean |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is much better than the Moto Z Play's overall score of 74.4. The OPPO Find X2 Pro body is newer than the Moto Z Play's, although it's a lot heavier and thicker. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper display than Moto Z Play, because it has a greater display pixel density, a bigger display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z Play, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features longer battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has a 21 percent more battery size. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low light photography, a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.