Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A15 5G is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Play, having a score of 77.4 against 74.4. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy A15 5G has the older 14 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though Galaxy A15 5G is extremely newer than Motorola Moto Z Play, it is thicker and somewhat heavier.
Motorola Moto Z Play counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A15 5G has a bit sharper display than Moto Z Play, because although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy A15 5G has a superior storage for games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Moto Z Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A15 5G features a slightly better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations.
Galaxy A15 5G not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.