Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play's 74.4 score. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer device than Motorola Moto Z Play, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version and Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a larger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy A52 5G has longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has a 28% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.