Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than Moto Z Play, getting a overall score of 86.2 against 74.4. The Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z Play. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the older 11 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit better performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a slightly better screen than Moto Z Play, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Play, because although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.