Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than the Motorola Moto Z Play, getting an 86.3 score against 74.4. Galaxy S10e's body is newer and just a bit lighter, but a little thicker than Motorola Moto Z Play. Galaxy S10e has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy S10e counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Moto Z Play counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3510mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. Galaxy S10e shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Play, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot larger aperture for better images in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy S10e costs a lot more than Moto Z Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.