Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z Play's 74.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a a little heavier device than the Motorola Moto Z Play, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, a bit greater display pixel density and a larger screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Moto Z Play counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 6% bigger battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 MP resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z Play, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.