Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the Motorola Moto Z Play, getting a score of 87.9 against 74.4. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a lot newer than Motorola Moto Z Play, it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little sharper display than Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Play has a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z Play, because it has a way higher video quality, a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better battery performance than Moto Z Play, because it has a 34% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.