Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has an overall score of 84.2, which is better than Motorola Moto Z's global score of 74.5. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro construction is incredibly newer, but way heavier and notably thicker than Motorola Moto Z. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has the older 14 version and Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a brighter display than Moto Z, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen. Moto Z has a very superior processing unit than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has less RAM and 4 less cores (although they are faster).
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels and a much better video definition.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.