Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z, getting a overall score of 80.3 against 74.5. Even being the best in this comparison, Google Nexus 6P is an older, much thicker and extremely heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto Z. Google Nexus 6P features a little faster processing unit than Moto Z, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores (but slower).
Google Nexus 6P has a screen that is very similar to the Motorola Moto Z one, because although the Google Nexus 6P has a just a little worse display density, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Motorola Moto Z counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Nexus 6P takes slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z, although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a worse resolution back facing camera. The Google Nexus 6P counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.