Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gray and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is better than Motorola Moto Z4's score of 79.8. IPhone X's design is older, a little heavier and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z4. IPhone X features a better looking display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little greater pixel number in each inch in the screen.
Moto Z4 features just a bit more memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The iPhone X has a better performing processing unit than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has less RAM and less CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Motorola Moto Z4 captures better photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a larger aperture for better images in low light situations, a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z4. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z4, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.