Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gray and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 has an overall score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. The Motorola Moto Z4 body is incredibly lighter and way thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both were released only a few months apart. These devices work with Android OS, but the Motorola Moto Z4 has 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a bit larger screen. The Motorola Moto Z4 features a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better camera than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same back camera sensor size and a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Moto Z4 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.