Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gray and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 general score. Even being the best in this comparison, the Galaxy A50s design is a bit heavier and a bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z4. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 operating system. Galaxy A50s counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit sharper display than Moto Z4. Both of them have a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a screen of the same size. Motorola Moto Z4 and Galaxy A50s have quite similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh. Galaxy A50s has a camera that is just as good as Moto Z4's camera, and although the Galaxy A50s has a tinier camera aperture, they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same camera sensor size, the same video frame rate and the same video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.