Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gray and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Moto Z4, having a score of 91.3 against 79.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10. The Galaxy A52 5G body is newer, but thicker and heavier than Moto Z4. Galaxy A52 5G features a bit superior CPU than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto Z4, because it has a quite larger display, a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more storage for games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G has improved battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.