Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is much better than Moto Z4, with an 89 score against 79.8. The Galaxy Note10 is an a bit thicker and just a bit heavier device than the Moto Z4. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z4, although it has a little bit inferior pixels amount per inch of screen, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller screen.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z4 has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto Z4 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lot more expensive than Moto Z4, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.