Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has newer 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a better phone than Moto Z4, we must note that it is also a thicker and somewhat heavier phone.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little worse pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z4, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note10 Lite has better battery life than Moto Z4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
The Moto Z4 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Moto Z4 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.