Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z4 is a little bit better than Galaxy Note3, getting a 79.8 score against 77.7. The Motorola Moto Z4 body is extremely newer, somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy Note3. These devices come with Android OS, but Motorola Moto Z4 has 10 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more CPU cores (although slower) and 1 GB more RAM. Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit higher pixel number per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Moto Z4 has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto Z4 captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos, a lot bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Moto Z4 has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.