Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is better than the Motorola Moto Z4, with a general score of 93.4 against 79.8. Even though Galaxy S22 is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z4, it is a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it counts with some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a lot better screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 features a slightly better camera than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a more mega pixels camera in the back and a way higher video resolution. Moto Z4 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z4 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 3% more battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 costs a lot more money than Moto Z4, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.