Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Gray and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is better than Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, offering a couple nice extra features and better performance. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z4's, but it is much heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Moto Z4, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a bit better pixels number per screen inch. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera, a way better video quality and a way larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the Moto Z4, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.