Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-06 | -- |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| Gray and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. Galaxy S25's body is thinner and notably lighter than the Motorola Moto Z4. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
Moto Z4 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 has a way better looking display than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Moto Z4 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z4 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has just a little better battery life than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy S25 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and videos, a much higher video resolution and a more megapixels back camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z4. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z4, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.