Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is a bit better than the Xperia XZs, getting a 79.8 score against 77.2. Moto Z4's body is a lot newer and a bit thinner than Xperia XZs's, but it is a bit heavier. Xperia XZs counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel quantity per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower). The Motorola Moto Z4 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with better battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto Z4, although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality, a smaller aperture, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a way worse resolution.
The Moto Z4 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.