Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is better than the Motorola One Macro, with an 81.3 score against 73.8. The Google Pixel XL body is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Motorola One Macro, although it was released many years before. Motorola One Macro has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Macro also has more cores (although they are slower).
The Google Pixel XL has a more vivid display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixel number per inch of screen and a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Google Pixel XL counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a lower 12.3 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F2 aperture, the Google Pixel XL also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Motorola One Macro counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Macro features a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.