Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is way better than the Motorola One Macro's score of 73.8. The Galaxy A71 5G design is a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Motorola One Macro, even when both were released only 8 months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy A71 5G has a sharper display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a higher pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little better battery performance than Motorola One Macro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a much higher video definition, a way bigger sensor and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.