Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola One Macro, having a general score of 77.8 against 73.8. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a incredibly newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than Motorola One Macro, although it is also somewhat heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a way better pixel quantity per screen inch, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola One Macro features a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery life than Motorola One Macro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos, a way higher video quality, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.