Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-15 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than Motorola One Vision, getting an 81 score against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is extremely thinner than Motorola One Vision, but it's a bit heavier and was released many years before. The Motorola One Vision features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola One Vision has a little bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520, a little bit bigger display and a just a little better pixel density. Motorola One Vision has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola One Vision shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with much more MP. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.