Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 overall score. Motorola One Vision is a incredibly newer phone than Galaxy S6 edge+, but it is notably thicker and heavier. The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a sharper screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit higher amount of pixels in each display inch.
Motorola One Vision counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Vision also has a greater number of cores. Motorola One Vision has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos, a bigger aperture to take better images in low light situations and a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola One Vision counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.