Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 311.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is a lot better than the Motorola One's score of 74.3. Although Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is newer than Motorola One, it is a bit thicker and incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a better display than Motorola One, because it has a quite bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A90 5G counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a little better hardware performance than Motorola One, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior camera than Motorola One, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a superior battery life than Motorola One, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.