Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than Motorola One, with a global score of 79.3 against 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola One, even though it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Motorola One features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One also has a larger number of cores (although slower). The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a lot better screen than Motorola One, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels density and a way better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a camera in the back with more mega pixels and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Motorola One features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola One also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the Motorola One one.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ costs a lot more money than Motorola One, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.