Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is a bit better than iPhone 8's overall score of 85. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is much newer, but a little bit thicker and notably heavier than iPhone 8. The iPhone 8 features a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a way smaller display, a little bit worse screen pixel density and a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334.
The iPhone 8 has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Motorola razr (2020) features a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos and a much more MP back camera.
Apple iPhone 8 has as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as Motorola razr (2020), they have equal internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Apple iPhone 8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Apple iPhone 8. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Apple iPhone 8, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.