Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than iPhone XS Max, having an 87 score against 84.5. Motorola razr (2020) is a noticeably newer and just a little lighter device than iPhone XS Max, but it's also just a bit thicker. IPhone XS Max features a little bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone XS Max features a better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit bigger display, a little more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels. Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a way more MP camera and a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
IPhone XS Max features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3179mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs more money than iPhone XS Max, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the iPhone XS Max. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the iPhone XS Max, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.