Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P, getting an 87 score against 80.3. The Motorola razr (2020) is a way newer cellphone than Google Nexus 6P, although it's just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture and a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Google Nexus 6P counts with improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Nexus 6P. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Nexus 6P, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.