Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is better than the LG V20's general score of 77. The Motorola razr (2020) is a noticeably newer phone than the LG V20, but it's just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. The LG V20 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
LG V20 has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola razr (2020) has just a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
The LG V20 has a bit better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3200mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG V20, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.