Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is just a bit better than the LG V30's 79.1 general score. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is newer than the LG V30's, but it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better processing power than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V30 has a sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V30 features a bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30 counts with better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V30. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some money and buy the LG V30, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.