Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's global score of 81.2. The Motorola razr (2020) is a a little bit heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little better pixel density, a better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as the Motorola razr (2020) one, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a more mega pixels camera and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.