Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than Galaxy A12, having a global score of 87 against 80.3. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version while Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features and better performance. Even when the Motorola razr (2020) and Galaxy A12 were released with only 3 months difference, the Motorola razr (2020) is just a little bit lighter and thinner.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 876 x 2142px resolution and a greater pixel number per inch of screen. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger diafragm aperture and a much better (4K) video definition. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A12 features a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.