Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A32's general score of 84.7. Although the Motorola razr (2020) and the Galaxy A32 were released with only 4 months difference, the Motorola razr (2020) is just a little bit lighter and thinner. The Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11 operating system, and Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better 876 x 2142 resolution. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video resolution, a 48 mega-pixels back camera and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.