Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2018), getting a general score of 87 against 84.2. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is newer, but just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A7 (2018). Motorola razr (2020) has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2220 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola razr (2020) shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way better 3840x2160 video quality, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with much more MP.
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with greater battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.