Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is a bit better than Galaxy A8 Star's 82.1 global score. The Motorola razr (2020) design is noticeably newer than the Galaxy A8 Star's, but it's just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A8 Star counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit better pixel density, a quite better 1080 x 2220 resolution and a bit larger screen.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A8 Star has better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.