Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than Motorola razr (2020), getting a global score of 90.5 against 87. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is older, just a little heavier and just a little thicker than the Motorola razr (2020). Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system, while Motorola razr (2020) works with Android 11 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit superior processor than Motorola razr (2020), although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit more memory for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images, they both have the same video frame rate, a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size back camera sensor.
Galaxy A90 5G features a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.